Skip to main content
Male Bombus brodmannicus by Pierre Rasmont

In search of the endangered Bombus brodmannicus bumblebee

A close up of a male bumblebee, Bombus brodmannicus

This delightful blog was written by Pieter Haringsma who was inspired to search for this bumblebee after reading our Bumblebees of the World blog on Bombus brodmannicus by Denis Michez last year. Pieter often provides the Trust with beautiful, captivating images of bumblebees and is definitely and expert in this field!

As a Dutch bumblebee fan, I read the Bumblebee Conservation Trust’s blog post about Bombus brodmannicus last year and fell instantly in love with this bumblebee. After a while, I thought it would be a great goal for the summer holiday finding this bumblebee living high in the alps.

I wrote to Dennis Michez, the author of the blog post and he kindly delivered me an article with GPS co-ordinates of earlier observations of brodmannicus. Negotiation with my wife took five minutes and a new bumblebee goal was born!

I plotted the GPS co-ordinates where brodmannicus was found in 2012 on a paper map of the southern French Alps. Later, I contacted Prof. Pierre Rasmont from the University of Mons and he gave me several extra locations and tips (bee professors seem a kind human sub-species). The specialised bumblebee forages solely on Cerinthe minor and Cerinthe Glabra, flies at 1,000-2,000 metres and has the mad behaviour of being active early in the morning (before 07.00 AM) and late in the evening. That was not a good forecast of a slow holiday!

We left on 16 July and after a five day break at the bee walhalla Doucier in the French Jura, we travelled to the French Alps, Barcelonette (1150 asl), where we stayed with our small caravan on the nice campsite le Tampico.

From here, we did several searches for Cerinthe on Col d’Allos and Col de la Cayolle slowly driving up by car and doing multiple small walks to look for the plant.  On Col d’Allos we found a great patch (“I see a patch” was the yell of the holiday) of Cerinthe just below the top and also one just over the top, but almost every plant had finished flowering completely.

As brodmannicus was also able to forage on several other plants which I’d forgotten, I decided to focus on a large patch of Cerinthe just under the top above a large parking place which was easy to re-find and access.

At a 100×50 metres area intersected by multiple sheep paths there were multiple Cerinthe plants. I went back in the evening and thought to have found brodmannicus there. Next morning, I went up by car at 05.30am and engaged a beautiful sunrise. Several bees were foraging after seven o’clock, and I found a nest site where males were very actively nest patrolling during the morning.

Dreaming about the first brodmannicus nest ever found, I shot and shot until a dark coloured bee entered the nest making me think; What are you doing in my brodmannicus nest… After mailing a British bee professor from Col d’Allos, the answer came when I’d returned to the caravan. No brodmannicus!! Perhaps Bombus Pyreneus.

I was not very disappointed as we still had quite a lot of vacation time left and I’d made many good shots at the nest site. To observe the behaviour of the males was very fascinating.  The males had different colour patterns and were very aggressive against each other. One male entered the nest site and was kicked out immediately, dying at the nest entrance were he was grabbed by a predating insect.

After a week, we left Barcelonette for the Queyras and found a campsite in the Ristolas valley at 1650 asl. Several days later, we did a walk above Abriès, where a 1.5km footpath covered with flowers ended at the ruins of some houses at a steep southern faced slope. There, we found the patch of all patches, Cerinthe just starting to flower.

Adrenalin filled my circulation as we went back the same evening and I found one brodmannicus worker sleeping in a Cerinthe plant hanging upside down in the flowers. No other brodmannicus seen and I only shot several photo’s of this bumblebee which awoke and started foraging. I lost her after a few minutes…

Next evening I returned to the spot, as the morning was too cold and windy. The same bumblebee was sleeping in exactly the same flowers as the evening before. No other bumblebees seen and I shot multiple photos of this sole bee and left it sleeping.

The next morning at dawn, it was only 6 degrees, I went back and was at the spot at 07.30am gambling that the bees would fly later because of the low temperatures. The sleeping bee had dropped off the plant and was for dead lying on the floor under the flowers where it hung the evening before. I had no sugar with me, so warmed the bumblebee in my hand where the resurrection took place and after extensive grooming and shivering, the brodmannicus took off from my hand which gave an intense feeling of connection with this beautiful, rare species.

The next two hours, I spent patrolling the plot continuously, walking from one inflorescence to another to check for brodmannicus activity. I did see roughly five other bees, so this is what rare really means: never abundant. It was a steep slope with scattered plants so the fast bees very easy left my sight all of the time. After several more shots, my macro lens had an auto focus problem, which wasn’t the best moment for it, but I had already won the first bumblebee price so I took it and looked! The bee activity stopped at around 11am.

Altogether, it was a great experience to hunt for a specific bumblebee in the summer holiday. It brought us to where I’d never gone without this goal. The Queyras, is a pesticide free area with an extreme abundance of flowers and bees.

It is weird that it does not belong to the Outer Hebrides!

By Pieter Haringsma, Delft, the Netherlands

Photo by Clare Flynn

So you’ve seen a bee, what happens next?

People looking at a bumblebee ID sheet with bumblebee in pot

Our Science Manager Dr Richard Comont, tells us how to identify and record that bee you’ve spotted.

We’ve all heard that bees are struggling. But how do we actually know this? And how are all the individual bee species doing? The answer may be closer than you think . . .

With over 250 species in the UK, including 24 species of bumblebee, the vast majority of our knowledge of wild bee populations in the UK (and pretty much all other wildlife) comes from amateur naturalists. The names have changed over time – from the Victorian ‘gentleman scientists’ (although there were many famous females too) to ‘biological recorders’ to the current favourite term, ‘citizen scientists’. But the activity has remained the same over the centuries: volunteers note the species they see around them, and make a record of their sightings with four critical pieces of information:

  • What (is it)?
  • Where (did you find it)?
  • When (did you see it)?
  • Who (saw it?) (You!)

For at least the past half century, these critical wildlife records have been collected centrally by national recording schemes and societies – one for almost anything you can think of is www.brc.ac.uk/recording-schemes. These schemes and societies and the national Biological Records Centre work with recorders across the UK to check the data, make sure that species haven’t been misidentified, and carry out mapping and analysis work (as well as much more besides). They act as the custodians for our centuries-long national wildlife story, seen through the eyes of generations of people who were aware of their surrounding environment, and recorded what they saw on a day to day basis.

It’s easy to add your own stitch to this great tapestry of wildlife recording. At the Bumblebee Conservation Trust, we recommend three ways to record that bee: ad-hoc (one-off) recording, FIT Counts and BeeWalk.

Ad-hoc recording

Ad-hoc recording is the simplest. Firstly, find a bee. Secondly, identify it to species. Thirdly, submit the record. Fourthly, relax in the knowledge of a job well done.

Finding the bee is the easy bit! Visit a patch of flowers, or plant some yourself. You can visit our Bee kind tool to help, and they’ll come to you. To identify it, you’ll find that practice makes perfect. Assuming it’s a bumblebee, sit with a book – this is a good one on bumblebees; ‘Bumblebees – an introduction‘, visit our Bee ID pages or an app such as the Bee ID app and study the bees as they come and go, or take pictures and run them past an expert for checking – iSpot or the UK Bees, Wasps and Ants Facebook group are great for this. You can also share your sighting with us on social media. We’re always pleased to see pictures or videos of bumblebees in your gardens or elsewhere and can help identify which species you’ve found – check out our tips for taking photos for identification. You can find us on Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram.

Once you have an ID, you’re ready to record. At the Trust we recommend using the iRecord system – it’s quick and simple to use, available as a website or an app, and the data is instantly available to any relevant wildlife organisation. In particular, we work with the national experts at the Bees, Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) to make sure as many records as possible make it from iRecord into the national dataset, where they can be used for mapping and analysis. Experts from BWARS monitor records on iRecord and it won’t take long for your records to be picked up. There are several other apps and websites, but none that check data as thoroughly (so there’s more chance of it being unreliable) or share their data as widely (so it can’t and won’t be used for analysis of bee populations, for example).

Structured surveys

The two other surveys supported by the Bumblebee Conservation Trust are FIT Counts and BeeWalk and are more structured. This makes them slightly more complex to carry out, but means that analysis of the data can be more detailed (because we know a lot more about how the data was collected), so they can be more informative than ad-hoc records alone.

Flower-Insect Timed Counts (FIT Counts) are part of the National Pollinator Monitoring Scheme (PoMS), which is a partnership of research organisations and environmental charities, including the Bumblebee Conservation Trust.  They’re designed to be a basic, straightforward survey for anyone to do when they have a few spare minutes, or as an activity with a school group or on a bioblitz.  A FIT count basically involves ten minutes of sitting by a small patch of flowers and recording what visits those flowers, but at a very broad group level – bumblebee, butterfly, beetle, etc (for full details visit the PoMS site).  The aim is to help us all get a better handle on how the different pollinator groups are doing relative to each other, which is important as we have a lot more data on some (e.g. butterflies) than we do on others (e.g. beetles).

BeeWalk is the Trust’s own standardised bumblebee-monitoring project*. Essentially, volunteer BeeWalkers walk a fixed route (a transect) at least once a month from March to October, counting how many bumblebees of each species they encounter. From this we can get an up-to-date idea of how bumblebees are doing across the UK, and we publish this analysis yearly as the BeeWalk Annual Report. Visit our publications page to read our latest reports.

In Conclusion…

A biological record is a window on the world of wildlife as it is at the time. Collected together, they tell us stories about the world as it is now, and of how it used to be.  They inform us of the issues, point the way to solutions, and confer a kind of immortality on the recorders who have their names preserved alongside their data.

Please do join the army of citizen scientists across the country.  You don’t need to be an expert, or spend all your spare time peering down a microscope, or to have acres of land managed for wildlife: all you need is an eye for what’s around you and the motivation to help us all better understand our bumblebees, and indeed all our other species, are doing.

 

Cherry blossom by Bex Cartwright

Pollinators in sweet cherry orchards

A cherry blossom tree bloom

by Zeus Mateos Fierro

The full bloom of cherry blossoms is a beautiful and yet ephemeral event that lasts about three weeks (typically from mid-April to early May). Numerous blossoms are available to pollinators, but resources are scarce for them in orchards after the blossom period. Cherry orchards have evolved in the last decades from the traditional open orchards with large trees to modern protected orchards with a smaller but greater number of trees.

However, pollinators are still needed to pollinate cherry blossoms and underpin yields, particularly since most of the varieties are self-incompatible and cross-pollination is required. Consequently, growers are highly reliant on managed pollinators. For the last three years, I have been researching pollination and pest regulation in commercial sweet cherry orchards in the West Midlands for my PhD at the University of Worcester. I have investigated the enhancement of wild pollinating insects, including bees, hoverflies, and butterflies through wildflowers.

Newly created wildflower habitats, with native perennial plant species, were established in the alleyways between rows of cherry trees to increase sustainable and resilient pollination. This is the first time that such an approach has been investigated under protective cropping, and could involve important benefits for the sweet cherry industry. A key aim of my project was to investigate what pollinators visited cherry blossoms and how effective they were delivering pollination services. I also investigated what pollinating insects used the wildflowers after the blossom period until late September. The study was funded by the University of Worcester, Waitrose & Partners, and Berry Gardens, in partnership with the University of Reading and NIAB EMR.

As with many fruit crops, cherries are typically pollinated by the western honeybee (Apis mellifera), but increasingly buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestrishave been used. Honeybee hives are hired and bumblebee nest boxes are bought, so that there are enough pollinators to support production. However, wild pollinators might be more efficient at pollinating cherry blossoms compared to managed pollinators. During our transect surveys in cherry orchards across the three-year study, we recorded a total of 19,738 pollinating insects, of which14,724 were recorded during the blossom period and 5,014 after. Managed pollinators were the most abundant with 6,502 honeybees, and 5,296 buff-tailed bumblebees recorded. Hoverflies were the most abundant wild pollinator guild, which accounted for 4,760 individuals, followed by 1,879 bumblebees, 1069 solitary bees, and 232 butterflies.

In total, 104 different pollinator species were recorded! This included one species of honeybee, ten bumblebee species, 33 species of solitary bee, 48 species of hoverfly, and 12 butterfly species. These figures show how reliant growers are on managed pollinators. However, despite the greater abundance of these, wild bumblebees (queens during the cherry blossom period) and solitary bees were more effective pollinating cherry blossoms, since they frequently contacted cherry stigmas and flew often between rows, enhancing cross-pollination.

Throughout my study, I found that wildflower strips increased the abundance and richness of pollinating insects, and therefore pollinator diversity, compared to unsown conventional alleyways. This led to an increase in fruit set. Although it takes time for benefits for growers to materialize, our approach has created a range of possibilities for growers to produce sweet cherries more sustainably. For example, wildflower habitats also provide resources to other beneficial insects (e.g. natural enemies), which can deliver pest regulation services throughout the growing season. The inclusion of wildflowers in the orchards also means the orchards can support pollinators throughout the year and not just during the cherry blossom period. The wildflower habitats are also an important tool for conservation, given that many pollinator species continue to decline.

Bombus kluanensis by Harry Taylor, NHM digital imaging unit

Bumblebees of the World Blog Series… #12 Bombus kluanensis

Holotype queen of Bombus kluanensis

by Paul Williams, researcher at the Natural History Museum, London, and Darryl Cox, Senior Science & Policy Officer.

Our Bumblebees of the World journey ends in the Arctic Circle with one of the newest described bumblebee species to science, Bombus kluanensis, named after the Kluane Lake in the Yukon region of Canada.

Latin nameBombus kluanensis

Common name/s: Kluane bumblebee

Colour pattern: Queens, workers and males broadly similar: mainly yellow, with a black band across the thorax at the wings, abdomen is yellow haired at the top, followed by a black tail or occasionally a black tail with an orange tip.

Favoured flowers: Unknown

Global region: Arctic

Geographic distribution: North America: Canada (Yukon) and U.S. (Alaska)

Conservation status: Not assessed

It is not very often in the 21st century that new bumblebee species are discovered. However thanks to molecular and morphological analysis by the world’s leading bumblebee experts, a brand new species was described to science in 2016. Bombus kluanensis, originally thought to be a variation of Bombus neoboreus was found to be genetically and morphologically distinct. Both species belong to the subgenus group known as Alpinobombus, an interesting group of bumblebees that can occur as far north in the Arctic as there are food plants available. Those that do inhabit the Arctic Circle are adapted to live with especially short cold summers and have larger bodies and longer hair to keep them warm. They might even be better at thermoregulation than other bumblebees, although this has yet to be investigated.

So how did Bombus kluanensis remain undiscovered for so long? In a recent assessment of the Alpinobombus group, Paul Williams and his colleagues note that the first specimens of this bumblebee species were two queens collected from the Klutlan Glacier in the Yukon, Canada, in 1913. It was not until 60 years later that these specimens were assigned the name Bombus strenuus (which would later be known as the Active bumblebee, Bombus neoboreus) in a review of bumblebees from the Western Hemisphere. A more extensive collecting effort was carried out in 1971 and 1972, in which 18 queens and over 200 workers were collected from Kluane, Yukon. These were also assigned the name Bombus stenuus upon review in 1986. They now reside in the Smithsonian collection in Washington DC, where they remained misidentified until 2015, when Paul re-examined them. What prompted Paul to re-examine these specimens was his discovery that two specimens, collected from the Saint Elias Mountains (Yukon) in 2010 by his colleague, Canadian Zoologist, Syd Cannings, were genetically distinct from other Bombus neoboreus. The DNA barcodes of the new species was later matched to other specimens found in the Alaska mountain range in the Denali National Park, Alaska, as well as the historical records from the Kluane region.

Since the discovery, Williams and Cannings have worked to find useful comparable morphological features which can be used to differentiate the Kluane bumblebee from the Active bumblebee. Some of the most useful features are a more extensively longer than broad cheek, more yellow hair with black hairs intermixed along the top two thirds of the thorax (the same area is very pale with few black hairs in Bombus neoboreus), a broad yellow band at the bottom of the thorax, and more black than orange hairs on the abdomen, compared to Bombus neoboreus.

The Kluane bumblebee has not yet had its conservation status assessed, however Syd, who works as Species at Risk Biologist for the Canadian Wildlife Service, explained some of the work that is going on in the region which should benefit the species:

“The government of Canada is interested in increasing the area of their protected areas, and doing this in a rational way that protects biodiversity, so they have given funding to the Wildlife Conservation Society to use the IUCN Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) protocol to delineate KBAs in Canada. The Yukon was selected as a test case for this protocol and we had a 2-day workshop in Whitehorse last month. Part of that protocol looks at endemic species where KBAs could hold more than 10% of the global population of a species (or in the case of a national KBA, more than 10% of the national population). One of the KBAs we looked at was Kluane National Park itself, and Bombus kluanensis was one of the endemic species that we used to justify mapping a KBA using the park boundaries. There are a number of species that are restricted to that region, presumably because of glacial refugia there during the Pleistocene.

Another area that we are interested in is Asi Keyi, a territorial park proposal to the north of Kluane, where we found Bombus kluanensis during a brief visit a few years ago. Yukon Parks is planning to fly into that area this summer, and we hope to hitch a ride in with them to look for endemic plants and insects, including Bombus kluanensis. Although I call this area a ‘proposed’ park, it really is more than that, since the area was identified by the Kluane First Nation in their final land claims settlement as a park. This means it will be a protected area, once all the agreements and plans are in order.”

Interestingly, the story does not end there. Further analysis of specimens collected from Alaska between 2015 and 2017 revealed a second group, ‘unnamed2’, which are genetically distinct from kluanensis, as though they might be a separate species. However, further research into these and other genes shows that these ‘unnamed2’ individuals each have two divergent forms of the COI barcode gene (the section of DNA commonly analysed to uniquely identify a species), a phenomenon that has not yet been widely reported in other bumblebees. For now, because B. kluanensis and ‘unnamed2’ do not show any geographic segregation, they are considered members of the same species, pending further investigation.


Links to further information

Williams, Paul & Berezin, Mikhail & Cannings, Syd & Björn, Cederberg & Ødegaard, Frode & Rasmussen, Claus & Richardson, Leif & Rykken, Jessica & Sheffield, Cory & Thanoosing, Chawatat & Byvaltsev, Alexandr. (2019). (Monograph) The arctic and alpine bumblebees of the subgenus Alpinobombus revised from integrative assessment of species’ gene coalescents and morphology (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus). Zootaxa. 4625. 1-68. 10.11646/zootaxa.4625.1.1.

Natural History Museum species account

Natural History Museum Bombus – Bumblebees of the world homepage

IUCN Bumblebee Specialist Group


Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Syd Cannings for his helpful information.

European Honeybee (Apis mellifera) by Gary Schultz

Our position on managed honeybees

A close up of a honeybee on a pink flower

9 March 2020

The Trust has published a new position statement on managed honeybees. The statement has been prompted by concerns that, under certain circumstances, managed honeybees can have detrimental impacts on wild pollinator species, including bumblebees.

Our Senior Science & Policy Officer, Darryl Cox, provides the background on why we’ve decided to publish the statement.

Q1. What prompted the Trust to produce the position statement?

There is an increasing body of research which shows that, in some situations, beekeeping can have negative consequences for bumblebees (and potentially other pollinators) by increasing competition for food and by passing on diseases. These negative consequences are most marked in areas where there are fewer flowers or higher densities of honeybee hives, and could potentially be serious where vulnerable populations of wild bees are present. This statement aims to mobilise that research into action and highlights important steps that can be taken by beekeepers, conservationists, and anyone else with an interest in helping bumblebees, to lessen any potential negative impacts of managed honeybees.

Q2. Is all beekeeping bad for wild bees?

No. The message is not that beekeeping is bad, and it’s definitely not something we want to avoid or prevent. Our aim with this statement is to help inform people of best practice and encourage responsible beekeeping and well-thought-out hive placement. Keeping honeybees is important economically for honey and wax production, and for pollination of some crops and wild plants, as well as being firmly embedded in our culture. Several of the Trust’s staff and supporters are beekeepers, and are also some of the biggest advocates for wild bee conservation. The important bit is finding the middle ground that balances wild bee conservation and beekeeping, and making sure that rare wild bees aren’t inadvertently harmed.

Q3. What are the main recommendations?

The main recommendation is to take a precautionary approach to how we do beekeeping so that we do not accidentally end up causing problems for our wild pollinator communities. Five specific recommendations are made in the statement which outline how the precautionary principle can be applied in practice.

The position statement is available here

Bombus gerstaeckeri by Denis Michez

Bumblebees of the World Blog Series… #9 Bombus gerstaeckeri

A bumblebee, Bombus gerstaeckeri, on a purple flower

by Denis Michez, Researcher at Université de Mons, Belgium.

September’s blog features a vulnerable European bumblebee species, Bombus gerstaeckeri, and comes from Denis Michez, a researcher at Université de Mons, Belgium, who studies global bee diversity and conservation.

Latin nameBombus gerstaeckeri

Common name/s: None

Colour pattern: Males and females ginger haired thorax that extends on to the top of the abdomen, the rest of which is black with a blonde/white tail (similar to Tree bumblebees, Bombus hypnorum)

Favoured flowers: Aconitums (eg. Monkshoods)

Global region: Palaearctic

Geographic distribution: Europe: Andorra, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine

Conservation status: Vulnerable (at European level)

Of all the bumblebees described globally, only three species are described as oligolectic (specialists), which means they have a strong preference for a particular food source. Two species: Bombus consobrinus and B. gerstaeckeri are specialists on plants from the genus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae), which includes Monkshoods, and also B. brodmannicus delmasi, one of the two subspecies belonging to the species B. brodmannicus, shows some degree of oligolectism on the genus Cerinthe (Boraginaceae).

Given their morphological similarity and their food specialisation on Aconitum, it has long been thought that B. consobrinus and B. gerstaeckeri should be two sister species or even two subspecies of the same species. However, the publication of the bumblebee evolutionary history demonstrated that these two species are not sisters. Fascinatingly, the evolutionary event of food specialization on Aconitum plants therefore took place twice, independently. The actual sister species of B. consobrinus and B. gerstaeckeri are B. koreanus  and B. supremus, respectively, two species with Asian distributions, which do not show the same specialisation.

Specialisation on plants with such deep flowers requires an extremely long proboscis (tongue).

Whereas B. consobrinus has a completely palearctic distribution from Norway to Japan, B. gerstaeckeri has a West-Palearctic distribution (Fig. 2) and mainly occurs in fragmented populations across mountainous regions. It is found in the Pyrenees, the Alps, the Carpathians and it is also present in the Caucasus. In the Ukrainian Pyrenees and Carpathians, populations are isolated and made up of a small number of individuals. Four observations in the Romanian Carpathians have also been recorded. When populations exist in isolation like this (Fig. 2), we sometimes find they become genetically distinct from each other over time, but in this case separate populations have remained broadly similar. They were however, more distinct than another more common species, the Garden bumblebee (B. hortorum), which is found across the same areas.

In the Alps and the Pyrenees, B. gerstaeckeri mainly visits the following Aconitum species: Anthora (A. anthora), Monkshood (A. napellus) and Wolf’s bane (A. lycoctonum). Several other food plants are occasionally visited by this species, such as Epilobium angustifolium or Delphinium dubium, probably for the nectar. It is not entirely clear why this specialisation has taken place, however it seems as though B. gerstaeckeri  is reliant on pollen from Aconitum plants for larval development, which could be down to the nutritional content of the pollen, but there is also the possibility that toxins within the plants affect this species’ pollen foraging choice.


Links to further information:

IUCN Redlist page

Natural History Museum species account

Natural History Museum Bombus – Bumblebees of the world homepage

IUCN Bumblebee Specialist Group

 


References

Cameron SA, Hines HM, Williams PH, 2007. A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 161-188.

Dellicour S., Michez D., Mardulyn P. 2015. Comparative phylogeography of five bumblebees: impact of range fragmentation, range size and diet specialisation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 116: 926-939.

Delmas R, 1962. Notes zoogéographiques et systématiques sur les Bombidae. I. – Le Bombus brodmannicus Vogt des Alpes françaises. Annales de l’Abeille 5(3): 175-179.

Delmas R, 1976. Contribution à l’étude de la faune française des Bombidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Bombidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (n.s.) 12: 247-290.

Konovalova I, 2007. The first record of the rare oligolectic bumblebee Bombus gerstaeckeri

Morawitz (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini) from Ukraine. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (n.s.) 43(4): 441-443.

Løken A, 1961. Bombus consobrinus Dahlbom, an oligolectic bumblebee (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Proceeding of the XIth Int. Congr. Ent. 1960 1: 598-603.

Løken A, 1973. Studies on Scandinavian Bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift 20: 1-218.

Mahé G, 2008. Bourdons rares du Parc Naturel Régional du Queyras (Hautes-Alpes, France). OSMIA 2: 21-25.

Moczar M, 1953. Magyarország és a környezö területek dongóméheinek. (Bombus Latr.) rendszere és ökológiája, Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum. Termézettudományi Múzeum évkönyve (Annales Historico-naturales. Musei Nationalis Hungarici). Annales Historico-naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 4: 131-159.

Pittioni B, 1937. Bestäubung und Nektarraub beim Gelben Eisenhut (Aconitum vulparia Rchb). Aus der Heimat, Stuttgart 50: 209-213.

Ponchau O, Iserbyt S, Verhaeghe JC, Rasmont P, 2006. Is the caste-ratio of the oligolectic bumblebee Bombus gerstaeckeri Morawitz (Hymenoptera: Apidae) biased to queens? Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 42(2): 207-214.

Tkalců B, 1973. Taxonomie von Pyrobombus brodmannicus (VOGT) (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Bombinae). Acta entomologica Bohemoslovaca 70 (4): 259-268.


 

Male Bombus brodmannicus by Pierre Rasmont

Bumblebees of the World Blog Series… #10 Bombus brodmannicus

A close up of a male bumblebee, Bombus brodmannicus

by Denis Michez, Researcher at Université de Mons, Belgium and contributor to the IUCN RedList assessment for several European bumblebee species.

This month Bumblebees of the World features Bombus brodmannicus, a poorly understood and endangered bumblebee species found in two fragmented populations separated by more than 2,500km!

Latin nameBombus brodmannicus

Common name/s: None

Colour patternQueens, workers and males have two pale whitish-grey bands on thorax, a broad whitish band at top of abdomen and red tail.

Favoured flowers: Eastern population visits a variety of flowers including clovers. Western sub-species specialises on Cerinthe, although will also visit other plants for nectar, particularly the males.

Global region: Palaearctic

Geographic distribution: Europe, France, Italy, Asia Turkey, Armenia

Conservation status: Endangered (at European level)

In the east B. brodmannicus can be found in north east Turkey and Armenia across the Caucasian mountains, where it can be quite locally abundant. In the West, the subspecies B. brodmannicus delmasi is restricted to high altitudes in the southern French Alps and a small number of nearby locations in Italy. The species is found on southern slopes of the southwestern Alps in subalpine and alpine zones supporting large patches of Cerinthe, its main food plant. The species is active very early in the morning and at sunset.

Last month we talked about how only three species of all bumblebees worldwide are considered as specialists on a particular food plant. Interestingly, the eastern population of B. brodmannicus, located in the Caucasian mountains is a generalist, while the remote subspecies found in certain valleys of the Western Alps (map above), B. brodmannicus delmasi is considered a specialist. This specialism was deduced from field observations reporting a marked preference of the subspecies for Cerinthe minor L. and Cerinthe glabra . Despite the species reliance on pollen from Cerinthe, it is also known to visit other plants such as Calamintha, Cerinthe , Epilobium, Scabiosa, Echium, Nepeta, Knautia and Stachys for nectar. This behavior is particularly relevant for males whose life-cycle is partly offset from the flowering Cerinthe.

The restricted distribution and food specialisation led to an assessment as Endangered in the IUCN Red List of European Bees. Because of its highly specialised foraging requirements and its already localised distribution in a small area of the Alps, the western population seems extremely vulnerable to warming from climate change. On the other hand, the eastern population is rather widespread in the Caucasian region with no apparent food specialisation. It is therefore much less vulnerable to climate change.

Links to further information

IUCN Redlist page

Atlas of European Bumblebees

Natural History Museum species account

Natural History Museum Bombus – Bumblebees of the world homepage

IUCN Bumblebee Specialist Group

References

Dellicour, S., De Jonghe, R., Roelants, D. and Michez, D. 2012. Oligolectisme de Bombus brodmannicus delmasi Tkalců (Hymenoptera, Apidae): observations et analyses. Osmia 5: 8-11.

Delmas, R. 1976. Contribution à l’étude de la faune française des Bombidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Bombidae). Annales de la société entomologique de France (N.S.) 12: 247-290.

Franzén, M. and Molander, M. 2012. How threatened are alpine environments? a cross taxonomic study. Biodiversity Conservation 21: 517-526.

Franzén, M. and Ockinger, E. 2011. Climate-driven changes in pollinator assemblages during the last 60 years in an Arctic mountain region in Northern Scandinavia. Journal of insect conservation 16: 227-238.

Goulson, D., Lye, G.C. and Darvil, B. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology 53: 11.1–11.18.

Iserbyt, S. and Rasmont, P. 2012. The effect of climatic variation on abundance and diversity of bumblebees: a ten years survey in a mountain hotspot. Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) 48(3-4): 261-273.

IUCN. 2015. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.1. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 28 May 2015).

Rasmont, P. and Iserbyt, I. 2010-2012. Atlas of the European Bees: genus Bombus. STEP Project. Atlas Hymenoptera. Mons Available at: http://www.zoologie.umh.ac.be//hymenoptera/page.asp?ID=169.

Rasmont, P. and Iserbyt, S. 2012. The Bumblebees Scarcity Syndrome: Are heat waves leading to local extinctions of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus)? Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) 48(3-4): 275-280.

Tkalcu, B. 1973. Taxonomie von Pyrobombus brodmannicus (Vogt) (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Bombinae). Acta entomologica bohemoslovaca 70(4): 259-268.

Williams, P.H., Colla, S.R. and Xie, Z. 2009. Bumblebee vulnerability: common correlates of winners and losers across three continents. Conservation Biology 23: 931-940.